VOlUME 05 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2022
Dudziro Nhengu
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i12-54Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The continuously evolvement of complex conflicts like terrorism and cyber warfare necessitate the quest for theories that are relevant and applicable across the global geographical divide. This triangulation of theories aids to a better understanding of how past and present human relations, historical dynamics and material conditions intersect to shape conditions for conflict and peace. Few researchers have inquired how the triangulation of old and new theories can enhance an understanding of modern democratic transitions. To address this research gap, I reflect on transitology and feminist epistemology, to explore their relevance, rationality and value addition to the study of conflict transformation in modern Africa. Transitology, one of the oldest theoretical frameworks that enhanced the study of conflict transformation in the West before the end of the Cold War, is majorly criticised as outdated and irrelevant to the study of modern governance and democracy processes (Mohamedou & Sisk, 2017; Saxonberg and Linde, 2016). Likewise feminist epistemology is criticised for narrowly focusing on women and girls’ rights, thus detaching itself from realities of conflict and peace studies (True, 2014; Anderson, 2020). Against this background, I strive to establish the link between transitology - a framework of theories of change towards democracy and feminist epistemology - a framework of theories of change towards inclusive conceptualisations of knowledge, to prove the relevance and rationality of both frameworks, and their capability to catalyse democratic practice towards egalitarian relations and societies. This study contributes to new modalities of knowledge production in the field of women, peace and security. Using secondary data from seventy-five articles, I juxtapose transitology against feminist epistemology, drawing examples from various African countries, to build evidence that demonstrates the relevance of both theoretical frameworks in the study of conflict transformation.
KEYWORDS:Transitology. Feminist epistemology, conflict transformation, Zimbabwe, theories
REFERENCES
1) Addelson, K. (1993). The man of professional wisdom. In S. Harding and M. B. Hintikka, (Eds). Discovering reality. Amazon Books.
2) Amling, A. and O’Reilly, M. (2016). From global promise to national action: Advancing women, peace and security in the Democratic Republic of Congo. One Earth Future Foundation and Inclusive Security.
3) Anderson, E. (2020). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
4) Bangura, I. (2020). Guidelines on women, peace and security: ECOWAS Department of Political Affairs, Peace and Security (PAPs).ECOWAS.
5) Bell, C. and O'Rourke, C. (2010). Peace agreements or pieces of paper? The impact of UNSC 1325 on peace processes and their agreements. International and comparative law quarterly, 59 (4), 941–980.
6) Boehmer, S. (1996). Political pressure in the formation of scientific consensus. Sage Journals.
7) Botes, J. (2003). Conflict transformation: a debate over semantics or a crucial shift in the theory and practice of peace and conflict studies? JSTOR 8(2), 1-27.
8) Bratton, M. and de Walle, N. V. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in a comparative perspective. Michigan: Michigan State University
9) Campbell, H. (2003). Reclaiming Zimbabwe: The exhaustion of the patriarchal model of liberation. Trenton: Africa World Press.
10) Cianetti, L. (2019). The end of the backsliding paradigm? Avoiding reverse "transitology' in Central and Eastern Europe. London: University of London.
11) Cockburn, C. and Enloe, C. (2012). Militarism, patriarchy and peace movements. Cynthia Cockburn and Cynthia Enloe in conversation. International feminist journal of politics, 14 (4).
12) Cornwall, A. and Goetz, A. M. (2005). Democratizing democracy: Feminist perspectives. Taylor & Francis.
13) Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia, 26 (2), 236-257.
14) Dukes, F. (1999). Why conflict transformation matters: Three cases. Peace and conflict studies journal, 6(1).
15) Du Plessis, S., Jansen, A. and Siebrits, K. (2015). Democratisation in Africa: The role of self-enforcing constitutional rules. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(1).
16) Fukuda-Parr, S. and Messineo, C. (2012). Human security: A critical review of the literature. CRPD Working Paper No. 11.
17) Fukuyama, F. (2015). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. USA: Oklahoma Politics.
18) Grosoguel, R. (2011). Decolonising post-colonial studies and paradigms of political economy: Trasmodernity, decolonial thinking, and global coloniality. TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of peripheral cultural production of the Luso-Hispanic world, 1 (1).
19) Hailbronner, M. (2017). Transformative constitutionalism: Not only in the Global South. American journal of comparative law, 65 (3), 527–565.
20) Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press.
21) Harding, S. (2007). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? In B. Wray (ED.) Knowledge and inquiry: Readings in epistemology, 352-384. Ontario: Broadview Press.
22) Hartsock, N. (2018). Revisioning the political. (2nd ed,). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
23) Hehir, A. (2011). The Special adviser on the prevention of genocide: adding value to the UN's mechanisms for preventing intra-state crises? Journal of genocide research, 13 (3), 271-286.
24) Hookway, C. (2010). Some varieties of epistemic injustice: Reflections on Fricker. Episteme 7, 151-63.
25) Horhonen, J. T. (2012). Constructing transitology: A contribution of the critique of the political economy of post-socialist transition. Helsinki University.
26) Huntington, S. (1991). Clash of Civilisations Reconsidered. Sage JOURNLS International Studies, 36 (2).
27) Huntington, S. (1996). Reforming civil military relations. In L. D. Plattner (Ed.), Civil-military relations and democracy (pp. 3-11). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28) IDEA. (2013, September). Democracy and gender equality: The role of the UN. Discussion Paper.
29) Jarstad, J. K. (2012). Introducing hybrid peace governance: Impact and prospects of liberal peace building. Global governance, 18 (1), 1-6.
30) Johnson-Freese, J. (2020). Women, peace and security in the military: The need for leadership. The Rule of Law Post.
31) Kaplan, O. (2012). Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32) Kibet, E. (2017). Transformative constitutionalism and the adjudication of constitutional rights in Africa. African human rights law journal, 17 (2), 340-366.
33) Korhonen, J. (2012). Construing transitology: A contribution to the critique of the political economy of post-socialist transition. Helsinki: Helsinki University.
34) Kulawik, T. (2018). The paradoxes of political epistemology: Democratization of expertise versus anti-genderism in Germany. Presented at the European Consortium for Political Research), General Conference. Hamburg.
35) Kusnierkiewicz, A. (2016). The coloniality of gender and the politics of difference. E-International relations.
36) Laurie, E. (2018). Violent Conditions: The Injustices of Being. Political Geography, 65, 8-16.
37) Lazarus, A. (2000). Feminist epistemology and conflict resolution: Some critical thoughts on training interventions for Sudanese women. The Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity, Women and the Aftermath, 43, 62-66.
38) Lederach, J. P. (2003). Conflict transformation: Beyond intractability. In G. B. Burgess, Conflict information consortium. Boulder: University of Colorado.
39) Lloyd, E. (1997a). Feyerabend, Mill and pluralism. Philosophy of Science 64, 396 – 407
40) Longino, H. (2001). The Fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton university press.
41) Mac Ginty, R. (2008). Indigenous peacemaking versus the liberal peace, cooperation and conflict. Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, 43 (2), 139–163.
42) Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top–down and bottom–up peace. Security dialogue, 41 (4), 391-412.
43) Mason, R. (2011). Two Kinds of unknowing. Hypatia, 25 (2), 294-307.
44) McLeod, L. and O’Rilley, M. (2019). Critical peace and conflict studies: Feminist interventions. Journal of peacebuilding, 7 (2), 127-145.
45) Miali, H. (2004). Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. Bergh of: Bergh of Research Centre.
46) Millen, D. (1997). Some methodological and epistemological issues raised by doing feminist research on non-feminist women. Sage Journals.
47) Mohamedou, M. and Sisk, T. (2013). Democratisation in the 21st Century: Reviving transitology. NY: Routledge.
48) Mohamedou, M. and Sisk, T. (2017). Democratisation in the 21st Century: Reviving transitology. Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge.
49) Ndhlovu-Gatsheni. (2013). Empire, global coloniality and African subjectivity. New York: Berghahn Books.
50) Nzegwu, N. (2006). Family matters: Feminist concepts in African philosophy of culture. ResearchGate. https://researchgate.net/publications-family-matters-feminist-concepts- in-african-philosophy.
51) O’Donnell, G. and Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
52) O’reilly, M., Suilleabhain, A. and Paffenholz, T. Reimagining peace making: Women’s roles in peace processes. IPI. htpps://www.ipnst.org/ipi-e-pdf.
53) OAU. (2000). Constitutive Act of the African Union, 1 July 2000. Addis Ababa: OAU. https://au.int/constitutive-act.
54) Lederach, J. P. (2003). Conflict transformation: Beyond intractability. In G. B. Burgess, Conflict information consortium. Boulder: University of Colorado.
55) Puley, G. (2005). The responsibility to protect: East, West and Southern African perspectives on preventing and responding to humanitarian crises. Project Ploughshares.
56) Reardon, B. (1996). Sexism and the war system. USA: Syracuse University Press.
57) Richmond, O. P., & Mac Ginty, R. (2015). Where now for the Critique of the Liberal Peace? Cooperation and Conflict, 50 (2), 171-189.
58) Rustow, D. A. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Towards a dynamic model. Comparative politics, 2 (3), 337-367.
59) Schoeman, S. (2015). Feminist pedagogy as a new initiative in the education of South African teachers. 80 (4).
60) Shapin, S. (1994). A Social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61) Sawade, O. (2014). Conflict transformation: Transforming cultures of violence to overcome injustice and poverty. Oxfam Humanitarian.
62) Saxonberg, S. and Linde, J. (2016). Beyond the transitology - area studies debate. Problems of post-communism, 50 (3), 3-16.
63) Schenoni, L. (2018). The Argentina-Brazil regional power transition. Foreign policy analysis, 14 (4), 469-489.
64) Smith, B. (2013). Understanding third world politics: Theories of political change and development. Palgrave Macmillan.
65) Stoddard, M. C. (2007). Ideology, hegemony, discourse: A critical review of theories of Knowledge and Power. HDL
66) Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. London: Pinter.
67) True, J. (2014). The political economy of violence against women: A feminist international relations perspective. Australian feminist law journal, 32 (1), 39-59.
68) United Nations. (1945). United Nations Charter. NY: UN.
69) United Nations. (2015). Report of the high-level independent panel on peace operations on uniting our strengths for peace: politics, partnership and people. Relief web.
70) UN Women. (2021b). Women's Participation in Peace Processes: Connections between Presence and Influence. New York: United Nations.
71) United Nations Security Council. (2000). S/RES/1325. Security Council Resolution on women peace and security. United Nations.
72) Winfield. N. (1999, December 16). UN failed Rwanda - global policy forum. Associated Press.https://www.e-ir.info/2012/04//07/rwanan-genocide-filure-of-the-international-community-/
73) UN Women. (2012a). System Wide Action Plan for the Implementation of the CEB System Wide Policy on Fender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN SWAP). New York: United Nations.
74) Wibben, A. (2018). Why we need study (US) militarism: A critical feminist lens. SAGE Journals. 10.
75) Zondi, S. “South Africa and SADC mediation in Zimbabwe.” In M. Rupiya. (2013). Zimbabwe’s military: Examining its veto power in the transition to democracy, 2008–2013 (pp. 49 – 79). Pretoria: African Public Policy Research Institute.